检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杜秀红[1]
出 处:《审计与经济研究》2015年第6期106-112,共7页Journal of Audit & Economics
基 金:江苏省教育厅人文社会科学规划基金项目(2013SJB790035);江苏高校哲学社会科学研究重点项目(2014ZDIXM016);江苏高校哲学社会科学研究基金项目(2014SJD149);江苏省社会科学应用研究(人才发展)重点课题(15SRA-8)
摘 要:选取了2002—2014年数据,运用显性比较优势指数、贸易强度指数、贸易互补性指数,对中印两国贸易结构的竞争性与互补性进行实证分析。结果表明:中国在劳动密集型轻工产品以及机械与运输设备上具有竞争优势,而印度在农产品、矿产资源类产品、医药化工、轻工产品等产品上具有竞争优势,中印的贸易互补性大于竞争性,在"一带一路"背景下,中印两国贸易空间有待进一步加大。The Belt and Road Initiative is an attempt made by Chinese Government in the new era. India is especially important for the implementation of the Belt and Road Initiative as it is the largest country in South Asia. Under this background,this paper examines the characteristics and patterns of trade between China and India by calculating RCA,trade intensity index,complementarity index using the relative trade data from 2002 to 2014. The results show that China has gained the comparative advantage in labor- intensive manufacturing industries as well as machinery and transport equipment while India the comparative advantage in agricultural products,mineral resources,pharmaceutical chemicals,light industrial products. Therefore,it is more complementary than competitive in the trade structure between China and India. Consequently,the trade volume between China and India is expected to increase dramatically along with the implementation of 'Belt and Road Initiative'.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200