检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:傅廷中[1]
机构地区:[1]清华大学法学院
出 处:《国际法研究》2015年第4期29-39,共11页Chinese Review of International Law
基 金:清华大学海洋科技培育(法律)专项自主科研项目--<国际海上运输合同法制度的新发展及对策研究>之一部分
摘 要:国际货物买卖法与海上货物运输法密切相关,但是,由于两个制度中间缺少有效的对接机制,以至于在某些交易条件下,有关当事人依买卖合同享有的权益在海上运输阶段却得不到实现。我国《合同法》中虽然规定了托运人享有请求变更合同的权利,但此种规定却不具备在国际海上货物运输中适用的条件。事实上,在海上货物运输法的框架之内构建一个适当的机制用以衔接两种合同制度,不仅具有法理上的依据,而且有国际立法中的相关制度可资参考。综合考虑各种因素,借鉴《鹿特丹规则》中的制度模式,在我国《海商法》中引进货物控制权制度,实为最佳选择。The international law for sales of goods is closely connected with that of carriage of goods by sea.However,due to the lack of an effective mechanism for connecting two legal systems,the lawful interests of the parties concerned to the contract for sales of goods cannot be achieved at the stage of maritime transport.Though the right of shippers for variation of the contract is provided in the Law of Contract,there are no conditions for application of such provision to the international maritime transport.In fact,the establishment of a proper mechanism for connecting two systems of the contract is of not only a theoretical basis but also the relevant systems in the international legislation for reference.By overall consideration of various factors,the best choice is,by drawing on the legal experience as regard to the mode adopted in the Rotterdam Rules,to introduce the system regarding the right of control into the Chinese Maritime Code.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3