科技查新合同的基本法律问题探讨  

On the Basic Law Issues in the Contract of Sci-tech Novelty Retrieval

作　　者：杨淑琴[1] 山文岑[2] 

机构地区：[1]鲁东大学资产处 [2]鲁东大学法学院

出　　处：《图书馆工作与研究》2015年第8期38-42,共5页Library Work and Study

摘　　要：科技查新合同存在着称谓混乱、合同书与委托书不分、合同性质不明确、条款不统一、不全面、权利义务不明确、部分条款内容对委托方不公平等问题。对此,应明确科技查新合同属于技术咨询合同性质,统一合同名称,完善格式合同条款内容,明确双方当事人权利义务和违约责任。At present,there are a lot of shortages in contract of sci-tech novelty retrieval,for example,name of the contract is disordered,memorandum in writing can not be distinguished with letter of authorization and nature of the contract is not clear,the contract terms are not unified and all-inclusive,party contractual rights and contractual obligations be not clearly expressed,some content of contract terms are unfair to client,and so on.Therefore,it must be defined clearly that contract of sci-tech novelty retrieval belongs to technical consultant contract in contract nature,name of the contract should be unified,some content of standard terms should be improved,and rights obligations and the responsibility for breach of contract should be clearly expressed.

关 键 词：科技查新合同 合同性质 合同条款 科技查新站 查新用户 

分 类 号：G252.62[文化科学—图书馆学] D923.6[政治法律—民商法学]