法的确定性和灵活性关系的疏释——立足于三大法系维度的探析  

Analysis on Relationship between Legal Certainty and Flexibility——Exploration Based on Dimensions of Three Law Systems

作　　者：段美玲[1] 

机构地区：[1]苏州大学王健法学院,江苏苏州215006

出　　处：《太原大学学报》2016年第1期41-45,共5页Journal of Taiyuan University

摘　　要：19世纪中期,强调法的确定性的、热衷于法律结构体系构造的概念法学产生。19世纪末,新的社会问题的出现,在法典中找不到答案,促使崇尚"活的法律"的社会法学、利益法学兴起。在现存的三大法系中,各有各的确定性机制和灵活性机制,这是各国法律实践发展的产物。当前就我国的法治建设而言,首先应当尊重法的确定性,树立起法律的权威,其次应适当地引入灵活性机制,但这种灵活性应受到有效的规制。Abstrca t:In the middle of 19th Century, conceptual jurisprudence , which centered on legal certainty and keened on construction of le-gal system, rose. At the end of 19th Century, new social problem came out , and there were no solutions from the codes , which led to emergence of sociological jurisprudence and intersession jurisprudence that pursued “living law”.Regarding the three existing law sys-tems, each has its own regime of certainty and flexibility , which is the fruit of development of their legal practice .In terms of the cur-rent construction of China ’ s rule of law , it is necessary to respect the certainty of law so as to ensure the legal authority .Meanwhile , legal flexibility is supposed to be considered , but it should be also effectively regulated .

关 键 词：法律 确定性 灵活性 法系 

分 类 号：D90[政治法律—法学理论]