检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:闫金[1]
出 处:《中国学校体育(高等教育)》2015年第3期71-76,共6页China School Physical Education(Higher Education)
摘 要:运用文献资料法、录像观察法、专家访谈和数理统计法对2014-2015赛季CBA总决赛北京队和辽宁队球员PER效率值数据进行统计,对比和分析。意在通过数据指标分析找出双方球队的优势之处以及有待提高的地方,以另一种角度的方式为中国男篮今后的发展出谋划策以及为今后参赛的球队提供有益的参考。研究表明:北京队得分能力较强,得分点较多,投篮命中率较高;2支球队的助攻都集中在后卫队员,北京队犯规次数控制比较好,盖帽能力强于辽宁队;防守方面辽宁队强度和防守积极性处于劣势;核心球员对比上北京队要优于辽宁队;2支球队球员PER效率值排在前10名的球员各占1/2,但是北京队相对比较集中靠前,说明北京队球员效率值高于辽宁队。Adopting methods of literature consultation,video observation,specialist interview and mathematical statistics,this thesis calculates,comprises and analyses player PER efficiency of Beijing and Liaoning team in 2014-2015 Season CBA Finals.So as to find out strengths of both teams and places need to be improved through statistics index analysis,give suggestion to future development of Chinese men's basketball in another perspective,provide useful reference to coming participating team.Study indicates that scoring ability of Beijing team is strong,with many scoring positions and high shooting average.Assist of both teams is concentrated in defender.Beijing team controls well in number of fouls,and also with better block ability than Liaoning.In defense perspective,strength and initiative of Liaoning is quite weak.Core players of Beijing team perform better than Liaoning.Both teams occupy half of top 10 players with highest PER efficiency,but Beijing is with higher ranking,which proves higher PER efficiency than Liaoning.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222