基于自由心证原则的篮球裁判员临场判罚研究  

Research on Basketball Referee On-Spot Decision Basing on Free Evaluation of Evidence Principle

作　　者：苏晓明[1] 

机构地区：[1]长春汽车工业高等专科学校,吉林长春130013

出　　处：《中国学校体育（高等教育）》2015年第5期71-73,87,共4页China School Physical Education(Higher Education)

摘　　要：从"自由心证原则"出发探讨裁判员临场判罚的影响因素及其形成认知偏差的原因,提出影响我国篮球裁判员临场判罚的因素及判罚意识的形成过程。以我国CBA联赛近年来裁判员临场判罚特别是争议判罚为研究重点,以自由心证原则下的篮球裁判员判罚意识形成过程为研究内容。采用文献资料、问卷调查、观察等方法开展研究。结论表明:自由心证是篮球裁判员临场判罚意识形成的重要原则,是基于裁判员良心和理性的判罚意识;我国篮球裁判员现状并不令人满意,年龄结构、性别结构等都有待优化;我国篮球裁判员的临场判罚情况并不能让大众满意,包括教练员、运动员、球迷,不同主体对于篮球裁判的临场判罚满意度均有待进一步提升;裁判员判罚意识包括原始意识、运用意识、应变意识、控制意识;裁判员认知偏差的形成有着主观、客观的多种因素影响。From perspective of 'free evaluation of evidence principle',this thesis studies factor influencing referee on-spot decision and reason of cognitive bias,and proposes formulation process of basketball referee onspot decision and judgment consciousness in China.Taking referee on-spot decision,especially controversial refereeing of CBA league in recent years as research emphasis,basketball referee judgment consciousness formation process under free evaluation of evidence principle as research content.Adopting research methods of literature consultation,questionnaire investigation and observation.Conclusion shows:free evaluation of evidence is an important principle for basketball referee on-spot decision consciousness formation,which is judgment consciousness based on referee conscience and sense.Current situation of Chinese basketball referee is not satisfactory,age structure and sex structure need to be optimized.Chinese basketball referee on-spot decision is also unsatisfied to different subject like coach,player and fan,which need to be further improved.Referee judgment consciousness includes original consciousness,application consciousness,strain consciousness and control consciousness.Formation of referee cognitive bias has its subjective and objective factors.

关 键 词：自由心证 篮球裁判员 临场判罚 

分 类 号：G841[文化科学—体育训练]