检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:欧建平[1] 庄广伦[1] 周灿权[1] 王长希[1] 詹前胜[1] 方丛[1] 舒益民[1] 彭文林[1] 张敏芳[1]
机构地区:[1]中山大学附属第一医院生殖医学中心,广东广州510080
出 处:《中华男科学杂志》2003年第7期524-526,共3页National Journal of Andrology
摘 要:目的 :分析反复附睾或睾丸取精进行卵胞质内单精子注射治疗的妊娠结局。 方法 :收集 2 0 0 1年 1月~2 0 0 2年 12月进行 2周期以上附睾或睾丸取精进行卵胞质内单精子注射治疗的无精子症病人 31例 (共 4 3个周期 ) ,对取精情况及受精、种植和妊娠结局进行总结。 结果 :2 4例病人顺利从附睾取精 ,7例病人从睾丸取精 ,无 1例出现感染、血肿或局部的功能障碍。与第 1周期附睾或睾丸取精 15 4例 (共 15 4个周期 )的受精率、种植率和临床妊娠率比较 ,结果分别是 78.39%与 73.6 4 % ,19.6 8%与 18.38%和 34.88%与 37.91% ,差异无显著性 (P >0 .0 5 )。 结论 :无精子症病人进行反复附睾或睾丸取精 ,是安全和可耐受的 ,其妊娠结局与第 1周期比较无统计学差异。Objective: To review the outcome of repeated percutaneous sperm aspiration (PESA) and testicular sperm extraction (TESE) for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Methods: Forty three cycles of 31 cases of azoospermic patients which underwent at least two PESA or TESE for ICSI from January 2001 to December 2002 were collected. The sperm retrieval, fertilization, implantation and clinical pregnancy were analyzed. Results: Twenty four cases underwent PESA and 7 cases underwent TESE. There were not any complications in these patients. Compared with the first cycle of 154 cases, the fertilization rate, implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate were 78.39 % vs 73.64 %, 19.68 % vs 18.38 % and 34.88 % vs 37.91 %, respectively( P > 0.05 ). Conclusions: Repeated PESA or TESE is safe and well tolerated in azoospermic patients. Compared with the first cycle, the differences of repeated PESA or TESE cycles in fertilization rate, implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate were not statistically significant.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30