检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑华龙[1] 吴富章[1] 郭涛[1] 蔡靖宇[1] 张勇[1]
机构地区:[1]武警部队安徽总队医院骨科,安徽合肥230041
出 处:《临床骨科杂志》2003年第3期211-213,共3页Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics
摘 要:目的 评价桡骨远端不稳定性骨折外固定器治疗与石膏固定的效果。方法 将桡骨远端不稳定性骨折患者随机分为两组 ,分别采用外固定器治疗和手法复位石膏固定治疗。用Dionst标准行功能评估、Stewart标准行解剖学评估。结果 外固定器组复位质量和疗效优于石膏组 (P <0 0 5 )。结论 桡骨远端不稳定性骨折行外固定器治疗是一种安全、简便、实用的方法。Objective To compare the effect of external fixator and plaster fixation in the treatment of distal radius unstable fracture. Methods 29 consecutive patients with distal radius unstable fractures were randomly divided into 2 groups. Group A were treated with external fixator and group B were treated with plaster. The function recovery were evaluated with Dionst scoring system and the reduction were evaluated with Stewart system. Results The effect both of the reduction and the function recovery were significantly better in the external fixator group (P< 0 05)than those in the plaster group. Conclusion It is safe, simple and practical to treat distal radius fracture with external fixator.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249