检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《循证医学》2003年第2期81-84,88,共5页The Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine
摘 要:目的 评价饮食能量的干预措施在变应性鼻炎(AR)、哮喘患者的症状和检测等指标中的意义。方法 检索策略:通过CBMdisc、MEDLINE等数据库全面检索国内、外已发表的相关文献。选择标准:AR、哮喘患者以饮食能量为干预措施的随机对照试验或临床对照试验。资料收集和分析:由2位评价者按照上述检索策略收集文献,排除那些不符合选择标准要求的试验。主要对第1秒最大呼气量(FEV1)、用力肺活量(FVC)进行Meta分析。结果AR饮食能量的干预措施目前尚无文献报道,观察哮喘患者低动物性脂肪摄入的长期效应,检测FEV1、FVC经Meta分析,干预后较前分别提高23%(95%CI,14%-32%,P<0.000 1)、21%(95%CI,13%-29%,P<0.000 1)。结论 通过低能量饮食及有关的干预措施,改善哮喘患者的症状和各检测指标,有显著统计学意义,有必要开展更广泛和更深层的原因探索。Objective: To evaluate the effect of calorie control diet (CCD) on the symptom and examination in patients with allergic rhinitis (AR) and asthma. Methods: Search strategy: The Search for all the related literature in MEDLINE and CBMdisc has been made. Selection criteria: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or controlled clinical trials(CCTs) for CCD registers. Data collection and analysis: A quantitative Meta-analysis was carried out by two reviewers by using updated information based on inclusion and exclusion criteria from all RCTs or CCTs available. The Meta-analysis was based on FEV1、FVC. Results: After testing FEV1,FVC,an increase in efficiency has been obtained by 23% (95%CI,14%-32%, P<0.000 1)、21%(95%CI, 13%-29%, P<0.000 1) respectively, through the observation of the patients with the long term low energy diet, compared with the case before. Conclusion: Low energy diet improved the symptom and sign of the patients with asthma, and there is significant statistical difference.
分 类 号:R765.2[医药卫生—耳鼻咽喉科] R562.25[医药卫生—临床医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15