检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陶其钧
机构地区:[1]上海港港口设计院,上海200082
出 处:《港口装卸》2002年第1期1-6,共6页Port Operation
摘 要:通过对集装箱堆场工艺、机械的主要技术参数、技术性能和营运状况调查研究和介绍分析 ,提出轨道龙门吊和轮胎龙门吊两个比较方案 ,并对这两种形式从技术参数、技术性能和经济合理等方面进行综合比较。结果表明 ,前者生产效率高 ,可减少堆场机械配置台数 ,易实现自动化装卸 ,宜用于具备条件的新建和改建的专用集装箱码头堆场 ;后者的土建及相关配套工程投资数较小 。According to the inrestigation on the main tachnical parameters, characteristics and operating situation of the machineries and technologies in container storage yard, two schemes, a rail gantry crane and a tire gantry crane, are proposed. Compared the two schemes on their techmical parameters, characteristics and econmic reasonableness, the result shows that the earlier has high productivity, less stacker machineries, can realize automatic handling easy, so it is suitable for the new and reformed special container wharf stacker storage yards with good condition, the latter investment in the civil construction and corresponding engineering is little relatively, so it reliable on investment and techmical maturity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.220