A Comparison of Performance between Macro-mobility Protocol and Micro-mobility Protocol  

作　　者：TANGHong NIENeng WUZhong-fu ZHAOJun LIAOXiao-feng 

机构地区：[1]MobileCommunicationsResearchLaboratory,Chongqing210096,P.R.China [2]SpecialReasechCentreforOpticalIntemetandWirelessInformationNetworkofCQUPT,Chongqing400065,P.R.China [3]DepartmentofComputerScienceofChongqingUniversity,Chongqing400044,P.R.China

出　　处：《The Journal of China Universities of Posts and Telecommunications》2003年第3期79-84,共6页中国邮电高校学报（英文版）

基　　金：ThisworkissupportedbyNational863(2 0 0 3AA1 2 1 540 )andtheAdvancedVisitingScholarFoundationofWestwardUniversityofMinistryofEducationofChina

摘　　要：Mobile IP is the proposed standard for IP mobility support. When a MobileNode (MN) is far away from home, registration at its home agent can cause a long handoff delay thatleads to significant packet drop and throughput reduction. In order to improve standard mobile IP,the mobility of MN has been divided into micro-mobility and macro-mobility. Some micro-mobilitymanagement protocols have been developed. We compare the performance between standard mobile IP(RFC2002, RFC3220, RFC3344) and micro-mobility management protocols and give some equations alongwith the analysis of calculating results.Mobile IP is the proposed standard for IP mobility support. When a MobileNode (MN) is far away from home, registration at its home agent can cause a long handoff delay thatleads to significant packet drop and throughput reduction. In order to improve standard mobile IP,the mobility of MN has been divided into micro-mobility and macro-mobility. Some micro-mobilitymanagement protocols have been developed. We compare the performance between standard mobile IP(RFC2002, RFC3220, RFC3344) and micro-mobility management protocols and give some equations alongwith the analysis of calculating results.

关 键 词：macro-mobility protocol micro-mobility protocol registration delay packetloss probability 

分 类 号：TN929.5[电子电信—通信与信息系统] TP393[电子电信—信息与通信工程]