检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋柏杉[1] 陈天国[1] 赵正旭[1] 唐坚强[2]
机构地区:[1]浙江省杭州市浙江医院骨科,310013 [2]浙江省杭州市浙江医院放射科
出 处:《骨与关节损伤杂志》2003年第10期678-680,共3页The Journal of Bone and Joint Injury
摘 要:目的 探讨三维CT(CT 3-D)在骨关节损伤中的诊断价值。方法 比较42例骨关节损伤患者的X线片、CT、CT 3-D,对照手术所见,显示各自的诊断价值。结果 X线片应用方便,是骨折的基本检查方法,但对于复杂骨关节损伤易漏诊,不能确定骨折类型;CT可明确骨折的部位、范围、移位程度,但阅片者需良好的空间思维能力和熟悉骨折部位的解剖结构;CT 3-D显示骨关节损伤直观、全面,有利于选择手术入路、内固定方式。结论 X线片对复杂骨关节损伤诊断帮助有限,CT能显示骨折情况,但需要丰富的阅片经验;CT 3-D是目前理想的复杂骨关节损伤诊断方法。对临床制定治疗计划有重要的指导意义。Objective To explore the diagnostic valure of CT 3-D in injury of bone and joint. Methods X - ray and CT and CT 3-D of 42 cases of injury of bone and joint were compared with, contrasting the finding during operation, and displaying diagnostic value of each one. Results Application of X- ray was convenient basic examination method in fracture, but it was easy to mis diagnosis and could not ensure the types of fracture; CT could ensure the position and the range and the degree of replacement of fracture, but the readers need better space ideation and familiarity anatomic structure of locus of fractures; CT 3-D could direct overall display injury of complex bone and joint, it was advantageous to choose the operative approach and the modes of internal fixation. Conclusion X- ray is limited to diagnose the fracture of complex bone and joint, CT could ensure fracture but need readers with rich experiences; CT 3-D is perfect diagnostic method of injury of complex bone and joint at present. CT 3-D was very much important to surgery to establish clinic treatment programs.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.13.165