TURP与前列腺开放手术的比较  

A Comparative Study on Transurethral resection of Prostate and Traditional Prostatectomy in Treating Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

作　　者：韩杰[1] 卓栋[1] 程庆水[1] 

机构地区：[1]皖南医学院附属弋矶山医院泌尿外科,241001

出　　处：《皖南医学院学报》2001年第4期256-257,共2页Journal of Wannan Medical College

摘　　要：目的　比较经尿道前列腺切除术 (TURP)和开放手术治疗前列腺增生症 (BPH)的临床效果。方法　我院自 1995～ 1998年间手术治疗BPH 2 40例 ,其中开放手术 15 5例 ,TURP 85例。对两组病人的输血量、术后膀胱冲洗日数、术后带管日数、住院时间、近期和远期并发症进行比较。结果　平均输血量、术后膀胱冲洗 (日 )、术后带管(日 )、术后平均住院时间 (日 ) ,TURP组均优于开放组 (P <0 0 1)。开放组出现近期并发症 118例 (76 1% ) ,TURP组 2 3例 (2 7 1% ) (P <0 0 1)。而两组远期并发症比较无显著意义。结论　证明TURP在许多方面优于开放手术。Objective To compare the roles of transurethral resection of prostate(TURP) and traditional prostatectomy in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH). Methods 240 patients with BPH were operated on from 1995 to 1998. Among them 85 patients received TURP and the rest underwent traditional prostatectomy. The amount of blood transfusion, days of douche solution and placement of urine catheter after operation, the hospitalisation time and complications between the two groups were compared. Results The TURP was better than the traditional prostatectomy in such respects as average amount of blood transfusion, days of douche solution and placement of urine catheter after operation and hospitalisation time. The immediate occurrence of complications after operation was lower in TURP group(27.1%) than in the control group(76.1%)while no significant difference concerning the distant occurrence was found in the two groups.Conclusion The TURP was better than traditional prostatectomy in many respects. =

关 键 词：TURP 前列腺开放性手术 经尿道前列腺切除术 手术治疗 前列腺增生症 

分 类 号：R697.32[医药卫生—泌尿科学] R699.8[医药卫生—外科学]