检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]苏州市第二人民医院,215002
出 处:《放射免疫学杂志》2003年第6期329-331,共3页Journal of Radioimmanology
摘 要:目的 :探讨检测血清、腹水AFP、CEA及CA1 2 5对良、恶性腹水的诊断价值。方法 :放射免疫分析 86例患者血清和腹水AFP、CEA及CA1 2 5的含量。结果 :恶性腹水组血清、腹水AFP、CEA及CA1 2 5水平较之良性腹水组差异非常显著 (p <0 0 1 )。在鉴别结核、肝硬化腹水和恶性腹水时 ,以CA1 2 5≥ 5 0 0U/ml、AFP≥ 30 0ng/ml为临界值[1 ] ,可提高诊断的特异性和准确性。结论 :血清和腹水中AFP、CEA及CA1 2 5水平具有鉴别良、恶性腹水的重要意义。Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of determination of serum and ascitic fluid AFP, CEA and CA125 contents for differentiating benign from malignant ascites. Methods Serum and ascitic fluid contents of the three tumor markers were measured with RIA in 86 patients with ascites due to various causes. Results The serum and ascitic fluid AFP, CEA and CA125 levels in patients with malignant ascites were very significantly higher than those in patients with benign ascites ( p <0 01). For differentiation of benign (mainly T.B and liver cirrhosis) from malignant ascites, CA125≥500u/ml and AFP≥300ng/ml could be taken as the critical value with high cpecificity and accuracy. Conclusion Determinations of the three tumor markers levels in serum and ascitic fluid were of high value for differential diagnosis of the etiology of ascites.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15