DHS与PFN治疗股骨粗隆间骨折患者的临床效果分析  

Clinical analysis of DHS and PFN in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture

作　　者：蒋科[1] 蒋勇[2] 

机构地区：[1]四川省南充市川北医学院附属医院骨科,四川南充637000 [2]四川省南充市川北医学院第二附属医院外科,四川南充637000

出　　处：《现代医学与健康研究电子杂志》2017年第4期20-21,共2页Modern Medicine and Health Research

摘　　要：目的分析DHS与PFN治疗股骨粗隆间骨折患者的临床效果。方法选取我院2016年1月至12月收治的64例股骨粗隆间骨折患者作为研究对象,根据不同治疗方式将其分为研究组(32例)与对照组(32例)。对照组行动力髋螺钉(DHS)治疗,研究组行股骨近端髓内钉(PFN)治疗;比较两组治疗之后的髋关节功能改善优良率。结果与对照组比较,研究组治疗之后的髋关节功能改善优良率更高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 PFN应用于股骨粗隆间骨折患者治疗中的效果优于DHS,值得在临床治疗工作中推广运用。Objective to analyze the clinical effects of DHS and PFN in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture. Methods64 cases of intertrochanteric fracture were treated in our hospital from January 2016 to -12. They were divided into the study group (32cases) and the control group (32 cases) according to different treatment methods. Control group,action hip screw (DHS) treatment,the study group was treated with proximal femoral nail( PFN),and the improvement rate of hip function in the two groups after treatment was compared. Results compared with the control group,the improvement rate of hip joint function improvement in the study group was higher,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion PFN is better than DHS in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture,and it is worth popularizing in clinical treatment.

关 键 词：DHS PFN 股骨粗隆间骨折 

分 类 号：R687.3[医药卫生—骨科学]