检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]大连理工大学机械工程学院,辽宁大连116094
出 处:《系统工程与电子技术》2003年第12期1488-1491,共4页Systems Engineering and Electronics
基 金:国家自然科学基金(60073036;50175009;50275019);教育部博士点基金(20010141005)
摘 要:工程背景为航天器舱的布局优化设计问題,为此我们研究了多种具有实用性的布局优化算法,并依据这些算法得出了多种不同的布局设计方案。航天器舱是一个复杂的工程系统,在概念设计阶段,能否对这些布局设计方案做出客观评价将最终决定整个系统设计质量的优劣乃至其成敗,因此系统方案评价工作十分重要。基于此,对国內外目前常用的系统方案评价方法的理论及其特点进行了研究,归纳为如下几类:层次分析法、模糊评价法、灰色理论法、物元分析法、聚类分析法、价值工程法、神经网络法以及综合评价法等,并简要介绍了各种评价法在工程领域中的应用情况,并就目前尚有待深入研究的问题进行了探讨。The engineering background of this paper is the layout optimization design problem of an aircraft cabin. So several practical layout optimization algorithms have been developed, from which a variety of design schemes with different layout performances are got. Aircraft cabin is a complicated engineering system. At the stage of conceptual design, whether a correct and objective evaluation can be made on these design schemes will ultimately decide a good or bad system performance, even its success or failure. Therefore, evaluation of design schemes is a very important task. Based on these considerations, the theories and characteristics of some evaluation methods in common use at home and abroad are studied. These evaluation methods include analytic hierarchy process, fuzzy decision, gray system theory, matter-element analysis, cluster analysis, value engineering, neural network and synthetical evaluation methods. For each method, some engineering application examples are briefly introduced. At last, some problems that are yet to be studied are presented.
关 键 词:复杂工程系统 评价方法 系统分析 布局设计方案 航天器舱 层次分析法 模糊评价法 灰色理论法 物元分析法
分 类 号:V414.5[航空宇航科学与技术—航空宇航推进理论与工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15