检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄道友[1] 彭廷柏[1] 王克林[1] 陈桂秋[1]
机构地区:[1]中国科学院亚热带区域农业研究所,长沙410125
出 处:《中国农业气象》2003年第4期12-15,共4页Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology
基 金:中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向(KZCX2-SW-415);国家杰出青年科学基金(49925102);国家重点科技攻关(85-009-01-04;9-004-03-02)等项目资助
摘 要:应用"Z指数法"来判断"土壤-作物"系统法所确定的干旱事件并进行对比分析得出:两种方法的指标既相互联系又存在差异。桃源县1960~2001年27次中等和中等以上干旱事件中一致率为29 6%,基本一致率为44 5%,错误率为25 9%,"一致"的个例多出现在60年代,"基本一致"多出现在70~80年代,"错误"多出现在90年代;两者在夏季发生的旱灾中一致性较好,秋季一般,冬季较差;重灾一致性较好,中、轻灾一致性较差;用"土壤-作物"系统法指标判断干旱,重旱约每3年一遇、中旱约1 9年一遇;用Z指数方法标准判断,重旱每7年一遇、中旱约2 1年一遇。The Zindex method was applied to judge the drought grades of 27 moderate or upward droughts determined by the 'soilplant' system method during 1960~2001 in Taoyuan County, Hunan Province Comparison results of two methods showed that the indices calculated by two methods were relative, but different from each other The ratio of consistency between both methods was 296%, basic consistency of 445% and wrong of 259% In which the droughts of 'consistency' happened in 1960s, 'basic consistency' in 1970s or 1980s, 'wrong' in 1990s The consistency of the calculated results by two methods was high for summer droughts, moderate for autumn droughts and low for winter droughts The better consistency was obtained in calculating heavy drought By comparing drought frequency using two methods, it concluded that the heavy droughts occurred every 3 years by 'soilplant' system method and every 7 years by Zindex method, while for moderate drought the frequency was 19 years by 'soilplant' system method and 21 years by Zindex method
分 类 号:P426.616[天文地球—大气科学及气象学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.210.152