宫腔超声造影、经阴道超声及宫腔镜对子宫内膜息肉诊断的比较  

Comparison of contrast ultrasonohysterography, transvaginal ultrasonography and hysteroscopy in diagnosis of uterine endometrial polyps

作　　者：周海霞[1] 刘艳萍[1] 

机构地区：[1]苏州大学附属第三医院超声科,江苏常州213003

出　　处：《肿瘤影像学》2015年第3期226-229,233,共5页Oncoradiology

摘　　要：目的:探讨宫腔超声造影(CUHG)、经阴道超声(TVS)及宫腔镜(HS)对子宫内膜息肉的诊断价值。方法:回顾性分析2011年4月—2013年4月本院应用CUHG检查子宫内膜息肉的患者83例,并与TVS、HS检查结果进行比较。结果:CUHG、TVS、HS诊断子宫内膜息肉的准确率分别为87.95%、78.31%、92.77%;CUHG、TVS、HS诊断子宫内膜息肉的受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)的曲线下面积分别为0.875、0.756、0.923。结论:CUHG对发现子宫内膜息肉具有一定的价值。Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic roles of contrast ultrasonohysterography(CUHG), transvaginal sonography(TVS) and hysteroscopy(HS) in the detection of uterine endometrial polyps. Methods: A total of 83 cases with uterine endometrial polyps were examined by CUHG, TVS and HS from April 2011 to April 2013. Results: The accuracies of CUHG, TVS and HS in the diagnosis of endometrial polyps were 87.95%, 78.31% and 92.77%, respectively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC) of CUHG, TVS and HS were 0.875, 0.756 and 0.923, respectively. Conclusion: CUHG is valuable in diagnosing uterine endometrial polyps.

关 键 词：宫腔超声造影 经阴道超声 宫腔镜 子宫内膜息肉 诊断 

分 类 号：R445.1[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学] R737.33[医药卫生—诊断学]