北京朝阳区卫生机构员工的心理应对方式现状及其影响因素调查  

The study of coping style status and influencing factors among staffs of health institutions in Beijing Chaoyang District

作　　者：周连红[1] 刘政华 宁丽[1] 马良[3] 孙红[4] 孟海英[1] 田慧妮 朱洁[4] 罗凤基[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京市朝阳区疾病预防控制中心,北京100021 [2]北京市朝阳区卫生和计划生育委员会,北京100021 [3]北京市朝阳区第三医院,北京100121 [4]首都医科大学,北京100069 [5]北京市朝阳区精神疾病预防控制中心,北京100021

出　　处：《慢性病学杂志》2015年第4期394-396,399,共4页Chronic Pathematology Journal

基　　金：首都卫生发展科研专项(2014-3-7034)

摘　　要：目的探析北京朝阳区卫生机构员工的应对方式现状及其相关影响因素,以期为北京朝阳区卫生机构员工的心理健康的维护及职业倦怠的防治工作提供参考信息。方法采用解亚宁等编制的简易应对方式量表及一般情况调查表对5 401名北京朝阳区卫生机构员工进行调查。运用SPSS 13.0对数据进行描述性分析、t检验、方差分析。结果北京朝阳区卫生机构员工在积极应对方式维度得分显著高于常模人群组(P<0.05),在消极应对方式维度得分显著低于常模人群组(P<0.05);不同职称、职务、教育程度、从业时间、年龄段的北京朝阳区卫生机构员工应对方式得分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论与一般人群比较,北京朝阳区卫生机构员工在应激情景中更倾向于采用积极应对方式,同时其应对方式受职称、职务、受教育程度、从业时间、年龄等因素的影响。Objective To investigate the coping style and influencing factors of the healthcare staff who work in health institutions in Beijing Chaoyang District. Methods A total of 5401 staff members were investigated by the simplified coping style questionnaire(SCSQ) and the general questionnaire. Results The positive coping score of the staff who work in health institutions in Beijing Chaoyang District was significantly higher than the norm group(P<0.05). However, the negative coping score was significantly lower than the norm group(P<0.05). Staff members of different titles, practicing time, ages have different coping scores. And this difference was statistically significant. Conclusions Compared with the norm group, healthcare staff in Beijing Chaoyang District tends to use positive coping when in stress situations. The status of coping style is affected by the factors including job titles, duties, education,practicing time, ages.

关 键 词：应对方式 影响因素 员工 

分 类 号：R192[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]