检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱显国[1]
机构地区:[1]南京理工大学专利事务所,江苏南京210094
出 处:《南京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2003年第3期63-66,共4页Journal of Nanjing University of Science and Technology:Social Sciences
摘 要:本文就专利侵权诉讼中公知技术抗辩的概念、适用范围、抗辩成立的判断原则、公知技术的自由与非自由等进行了探讨,提出对抗专利侵权指控的技术应当是一项公知的技术,而非自由公知技术,公知技术抗辩适用于所有的专利类型,适用于相同侵权或等同侵权的范畴,抗辩的技术可以是独立或组合而成的技术。公知技术抗辩程序实质上属于一种专利权“虚拟无效宣告程序”,它可提高专利侵权审判的效率,防止专利权的滥用,有效保护公众的合法权益。This paper deals with the widely-known technology plea in the patent infringement litigation in terms of its concept, its scope of application, the principles of judgement, and the problems of freedom. It proposes that the technology against the patent infringement is supposed to be a kind of widely-known technology, but it should not be free. The widely-known technology pleas could be applied to all sorts of patents, including the realm of the same or similar infringement. This kind of technology could be both independent and component.The widely-known technology plea, in effect, belongs to a process of virtually invalid patent. This modei promotes the judgement of the patent infringement, guards against the abuse of patents, and protects the rights and interests of the public.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28