盆腔留置插管治疗慢性盆腔炎临床研究  

The treatment of chronic pid with the pelvic indwelling catheterization

作　　者：杨华光[1] 黄飞[1] 邱贞琴 李东红[1] 迪丽[1] 井红鸽[1] 

机构地区：[1]第四军医大学唐都医院妇产科,陕西西安710038 [2]第89中心医院中药房,山东潍坊261043

出　　处：《中国现代医学杂志》2004年第2期89-92,共4页China Journal of Modern Medicine

摘　　要：目的　寻找一种较传统法治疗慢性盆腔炎更为有效的临床治疗方法。方法　选择经电视腹腔镜确诊的慢性盆腔炎患者 10 3例 ,按完全随机设计分为 3组 :中药组 36例 ,应用盆腔留置插管滴入中成药盆腔炎注射液 ;西药组 33例 ,应用盆腔留置插管滴入抗生素 ;对照组 34例 ,应用静脉滴入法给予抗生素。采用临床查体及B超检查评定临床疗效。结果　中药组在临床治愈率、盆腔炎性肿块消退率等方面显著高于对照组 (均P <0 .0 1) ,与西药组比较 ,差异无显著性 (均P >0 .0 5 ) ;西药组与对照组比较 ,二组在临床治愈率、盆腔炎性肿块消退率差异有显著性 (P <0 .0 5 ) ;中药组与西药组均无明显的毒副作用。结论　对于慢性盆腔炎患者 ,采用盆腔留置插管法滴入中成药盆腔注射液及抗生素其临床疗效明显优于静脉滴入抗生素法。Objective:To seek a more effective treatment on the chronic pelvic inflammatory disease than the traditional methods. Methods:The patients were divided into 3 groups, Group A (n=36) was treated through pelvic, indwelling catheterization with “盆腔炎注射液” (a kind of Chinese patent medicine ), group B (n=33) was given the antibiotic through pelvic indwelling catheterization, and group C (n=34) was given antibiotic intravenously, then the clinical effects in each group were evaluated. Results:The rates of healing and the pelvic inflammatory mass extinction in group A were significantly higher than those of the group C (P<0.01) , while there were no difference between the rates of the group A and the group B(P>0.05); The rates in group B were significantly higher than those of the group C (P<0.05); There was no complications or adverse effect observed.Conclusions:The pelvic indwelling catheterization was a more attractive method for the treatment of CPID.

关 键 词：慢性盆腔炎 留置插管 盆腔炎注射液 疗效 抗生素 

分 类 号：R711.33[医药卫生—妇产科学]