检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]河南省漯河市第二人民医院CT室,河南漯河462000 [2]漯河市卫校附属医院
出 处:《实用放射学杂志》2003年第6期544-546,共3页Journal of Practical Radiology
摘 要:目的 对比CT导引下肾囊肿单次和反复冲洗法硬化治疗的疗效。方法 选 96例单发肾囊肿采用经皮穿刺硬化治疗。其中 45例 (A组 )采用常规单次法 ,即抽出囊液后立即注入 99.7%无水乙醇 ,保留后再抽出。 5 1例 (B组 )采用反复冲洗法 ,反复冲洗至少 1~ 2次 ,保留后再抽出。结果 本组全部经B超或CT随访 ,随访时间为 3~ 6个月 ,A组治疗有效率为 91.1% ,治愈率为62 .2 %。B组治疗有效率为 98.8% ,治愈率为 80 .4%。A、B 2组治愈率对比有差异 (Ρ <0 .0 5 )。结论 CT导引下经皮穿刺抽吸硬化剂治疗肾囊肿具有疗效高、并发症低、创伤小的特点 ,采用反复冲洗法能提高治愈率、降低复发率。Objective To compare the results of single and repeated percutaneous sclerotherapy in patients with simple renal cysts .Methods 96 patients with simple renal cysts underwent needle aspiration and sclerotherapy under CT guidance. 45 patients (group A) underwent one session of sclerotherapy with 99.7% ethanol immediately after aspiration and 51 patients (group B) underwent repeated sclerotherapy at least twice. The patients were followed up using ultrasonography or CT at 3~6 months intervals. The complete or almost disappearance of the renal cyst was considered a successful treatment.Results The efficacy of treatment was significantly different in two group . The overall effective rate were 91.1% and 98.8% in group A and group B , respectively. The rate of complete regression was significantly better in group B (80.4%) than in group A (62.2%,Ρ<0.05).Conclusion These results suggest that multiple sclerotherapy is better than a single injection of sclerosant for reducing the recurrence of simple renal cysts.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229