宋刊本《孙子》十三篇新诂  

New Perspectives in Studying Sunzi's Art of War

作　　者：褚良才[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江大学军事教研室,浙江杭州310027

出　　处：《浙江大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2003年第5期100-107,共8页Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences

摘　　要：自汉代史学家司马迁《史记》记载孙子其人其书其事至今,已有二千五百余年。此间,东汉末曹操首开注释《孙子》十三篇之先河,其后有唐代的李筌、杜佑、杜牧;宋代的梅尧臣、张预、郑友贤、施子美;明代的刘寅、谈恺、归有光、赵本学、李贽、王世贞、茅元仪;清代的夏振翼、孙星衍、邓廷罗、魏源等著名学者为之训释。至近现代,又有几百注家相继涌现,方家精注不可谓不夥矣。然通览细按《孙子》十三篇之正文并对照诸家之注文,颇觉其正文尚多存未被发明确训之处,而其注文更有误训、疏训、漏训之弊,实为待琢之璞与当剔之瑕,应还其原貌、阐其原义,补正历代注家之阙误。The study of Sunzi's Art of War has been popular throughout the last 2,500 years. Beginning with Cao Cao' Notes, it has been untiringly carried on by many wellknown scholars through different dynasties until our modern age when hundreds of scholars are working enthusiastically in studying it in various approaches. Notes by 11 Scholars is the oldest and most popular study on the text. Textual errors and misunderstandings of the original scriptures are nevertheless frequently spotted. This essay presents an indepth survey of some different notes over a number of indeterminacies in the original scriptures. The text is carefully proofread, noted and corrected. Indexing and redactional approaches are applied in the synchronic as well as diachronic studies of the text. Modern grammatical, lexicological, phonetic and other linguistic theories together with cultural and historical surveys are attempted toward a better understanding of Sunzi's Art of War. Further studies will have to be continued due to the lack of reliable historical references.

关 键 词：孙子兵法 历代旧注 疏理新诂 

分 类 号：H131[语言文字—汉语]