检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴煦[1] WU Xu(Law School,Dalian Maritime University,Dalian 116026,China)
出 处:《中国海商法研究》2019年第1期11-17,共7页Chinese Journal of Maritime Law
基 金:辽宁省社科规划基金"网络信息化下的智能合同研究"(L18BFX013)
摘 要:在《海商法》修订的过程中,是否将内河运输纳入《海商法》的适用范围成了争论的热点。支持者认为,由于民法对内河运输调整不具有针对性,司法解释也很难进行大面积的法律漏洞的补充,《水路货物运输规则》也很难作为航运习惯予以适用,因此,应考虑以专章的形式将内河运输有关的法律规则规定在《海商法》中,以适应航运中司法实践的需要。In the process of amending the China Maritime Code( CMC),whether inland waterway transport should be included in the scope of application of the CMC has become a hot topic of debate. Supporters believe that: Firstly,the civil law has no pertinence to the adjustment of inland waterway transportation. Secondly,judicial interpretation is also difficult to take on the supplement of a large area of legal loopholes. Thirdly,the rules of the domestic carriage of goods by water are also difficult to apply as a shipping custom. Therefore,a special chapter should be considered to incoporate the relevant laws and regulations of inland waterway transport in the CMC so as to meet the needs of judicial practice of shipping.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.185