经济增长与农村扶贫绩效的区域差异  

Economic Growth and Regional Disparities in Performance of Rural Poverty Alleviation

作　　者：陈菁[1] 贺达水[2] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学农业与农村发展学院,北京海淀100872 [2]国务院研究室农村经济研究司,北京西城100017

出　　处：《中国延安干部学院学报》2015年第4期120-126,共7页Journal of China Executive Leadership Academy Yan’an

摘　　要：为解释农村扶贫绩效的区域差异,本文构建了政府、市场和贫困的分析框架,利用国家级扶贫开发重点县的贫困监测数据进行实证分析。结果显示,经济增长对减贫具有正向作用,但经济增长对低收入群体的贡献率要大于贫困群体,表明收入略高的贫困群体更能从经济增长中获取机会;人均财政收入增长同样有利于减贫,但相比贫困群体,低收入群体从财政增长中受益更多;农村传统救济人数占比对贫困发生率变动有显著的正向影响,但对于低收入发生率变动的影响有不显著的负向影响;工业增长无论对贫困发生率的变动还是对低收入发生率的变动均为正向影响;更好的基础设施、卫生条件和农业生产条件有利于降低贫困发生率和低收入发生率。By setting up an analytical framework of government,market and poverty,this article makes an empirical analysis of the poverty monitoring data gathered from key counties under the national poverty reduction and development plan for the purpose of explaining the regional disparities in performance of rural poverty alleviation efforts.The data analysis indicates that economic growth has positive effect on poverty reduction,yet its beneficial rate is greater for the low- income group than the poverty group,which shows that those of the poverty group with somewhat higher income can gain greater opportunity from economic growth;the growth of per capital fiscal revenue is helpful for poverty alleviation,but compared with the poverty group,the low- income group benefit more greatly;the percentage of traditional rural population on relief is in noticeable positive proportion to the changes of poverty incidence yet not very noticeable to that of low-income incidence.Industrial growth has positive effects on the changes of both poverty and low-income incidences;and better infrastructures,health conditions and agricultural production conditions facilitates the reduction of poverty and low- income incidences.

关 键 词：经济增长 农村扶贫开发 扶贫绩效 区域差异 

分 类 号：F124[经济管理—世界经济] F323.8