检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:梅雀林[1] 李彦豪[1] 何晓峰[1] 陈勇 卢伟[1] 赵剑波[1]
机构地区:[1]第一军医大学附属南方医院介入科,广州510515
出 处:《临床放射学杂志》2004年第2期147-149,共3页Journal of Clinical Radiology
摘 要:目的 探讨移植肾动脉狭窄 (TRAS)的介入治疗方法。资料与方法 采用经皮血管内成形术 (PTA)和 /或内支架治疗 2 0例TRAS患者 ,对其技术成功率、再狭窄率以及狭窄类型对介入治疗的影响进行分析。结果 (1)PTA和内支架治疗TRAS的技术成功率分别为 71.4 %、10 0 % ,再狭窄率分别为 2 0 %、2 2 .2 %。(2 )Ⅰ型、Ⅱ型、Ⅲ型狭窄介入治疗的技术成功率分别为 92 .9%、85 .7% ,0 ,再狭窄率分别为 2 3.1%、16 .7%。结论 (1)Ⅰ型、Ⅱ型狭窄为介入治疗的良好适应证。 (2 )PTA依然为TRAS的首选方法 。Objective To discuss the interventional therapy for the transplanted renal artery stenosis (TRAS).Materials and Methods Twenty patients with TRAS were treated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and/or stenting. The technical success, restenosis and the influence of stenotic type on therapeutic result were analyzed.Results (1) The technical success rate was 71.4% and 100%, while the restenosis rate was 20% and 22.2%, in PTA group and in stent group, respectively. (2) For type Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ stenosis, the technical success rate was 92.9%, 85.7% and 0%, while the restenosis rate was 23.1%, 16.7% and 0%, respectively.Conclusion (1) TRAS of type Ⅰ and Ⅱ is suitable for interventional therapy. (2) PTA is the choice of treatment for TRAS and stent can be used as its supplementary means.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117