交易费用、风险规避与农地金融切入点选择  

Selection on Portal of Farmland Finance According to Transaction Cost and Risk Hedging

作　　者：聂强[1] 张颖慧[1] 罗剑朝[1] 

机构地区：[1]西北农林科技大学经济管理学院,陕西杨凌712100

出　　处：《西北农林科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2004年第1期65-68,共4页Journal of Northwest A&F University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家自然科学基金"中国农地金融制度构建方案与管理创新研究"应急项目(70141024)

摘　　要：根据合约理论,比较了农地金融三个可能的切入点:保障型耕地、发展型耕地与"四荒"地。所对应三种合约所面临的交易费用及风险规避需要,得出"四荒"地合约包含的交易费用最低,又最大化的体现了合约方风险规避的需要,成为最优的合约选择;发展型耕地合约仅次于"四荒"地,是次优但可行的合约选择;保障型合约是最不经济的合约选择,因此在现阶段,我国农地金融制度的构建应将"四荒"地或发展型耕地作为切入点。The paper points out three potential portals for farmland finance institution(FFI), farmland of dependent type (FDT), farmland of profit type (FPT) and four-barren land (FL).Contrasts were made between potential transaction costs and demand of risk hedging of three contracts related three starting-points above,according to contract theory.The FL contract contains the lowest transaction cost while the best solution for risk hedging demand,therefore constitutes a optimal selection. The following is the FPT contract, sub-optimal but possible selection, so the FDT contract the worst one. The paper, therefore, states that FL or FPT should be made portal as designing FFI in current time.

关 键 词：农地金融 制度切入点 交易费用 风险规避 

分 类 号：F301[经济管理—产业经济]