猪用中草药饲料添加剂组方筛选试验  

The Screening Test on the Formula of Chinese Herb As Feed Additives for swine

作　　者：戴荣国[1] 曹国文[1] 曾代勤[1] 姜永康[1] 陈春林[1] 周淑兰[1] 刘宗惠[1] 钟正泽[1] 

机构地区：[1]重庆市养猪科学研究院,重庆荣昌402460

出　　处：《四川畜牧兽医》2003年第11期22-23,共2页Sichuan Animal & Veterinary Sciences

基　　金：重庆市"十五"科技攻关项目(编号:2001-41-13)。

摘　　要：试验采用单因子设计,54头断奶猪(长×荣,20kg左右)根据体重、性别随机分成6个处理组,每个处理3次重复,每次重复3头试验猪。结果表明:20～60kg阶段,平均日增重(ADG)Ⅰ、Ⅱ组显著高于Ⅳ组和抗生素组25.80%、26.03%和25.27%、25.49%(p<0.05)。增重/料耗(G/F)各处理间无显著差异,但中草药Ⅰ组、Ⅱ组、Ⅲ组较抗生素组有提高趋势。20～90kg整个生长育肥期分析,Ⅰ组显著高于抗生素组20.89%(p<0.05);G/F中草药组都比抗生素组有提高趋势,分别为7.48%、4.33%、6.30%、6.30%、0.78%(P>0.05)。A single factorial was used in the experiment,54weaned piglets(Landrace×Rongchang,20kg initially)were allotted into6treatment s(Ⅰ～Ⅴchinese medical herb groups andⅣantibiotic group)of3replicates with3pigs per replicate by weight and sex.The results showed that,at20～60kg stage,ADG in the experiment ,groupⅠandⅡwere higher25.80%、26.03%and25.27%、25.49%(p<0.05)than that ofⅣand antibiotic groups.G/F Were not significantly influenced among treatment groups,but showing the higher tendency than in groupsⅠ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ.At 20～90kg stage,ADG,the experiment groupⅠwas higher20.89%(p<0.05)than in antibiotic group.G/F,the chinese medical herb groups showed a tendency to improve,they were7.48%、4.33%、6.30%、6.30%、0.78%(P>0.05)respectively higher than that of antibiotic group.

关 键 词：饲料添加剂 中草药 养猪 组方 筛选 

分 类 号：S816.7[农业科学—饲料科学]