评罗尔斯的规则功利主义惩罚思想  

Analysis on Rawls' Rule Utilitarian Thinking of Punishment

作　　者：王立峰[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院,北京100872

出　　处：《国家行政学院学报》2004年第2期42-45,共4页Journal of China National School of Administration

摘　　要：罗尔斯在《两种规则概念》一文中 ,提出了一种规则功利主义的混合理论 ,他首先对惩罚的制度层面和实践层面进行区分 ,在此基础上分别从两个层面对惩罚进行证明 ,认为惩罚的制度层面可以用功利主义进行证明 ,实践层面可以用报应主义进行证明。但是 ,由于规则功利主义自身的缺陷 ,以及罗尔斯对传统报应主义、功利主义认识的局限 ,这种调和的努力被证明是失败的。In 'Two concepts of Rules',Rawls put forward a mixed theory to reconciliate the utilitarian and retributive theories. He distinguishes between the justification of an institution and the justification of practice. Rawls points out that utilitarianism justify the punishment as an institution and retributivism justify punishment as a particular case. But because of the weakness of rule utilitarianism,the limits of Rawls' understandings of traditional utilitarian and retributive theories,the reconciliation failed.

关 键 词：惩罚 报应主义 规则功利主义 行为功利主义 

分 类 号：D90[政治法律—法学理论]