头胸导联和常规Wilson导联对右侧显性旁道体表心电图定位的比较  被引量:5

A COMPARISON OF HEAD-CHEST LEAD AND ROUTINE WILSON'S LEAD IN LOCALIZATION OF RIGHT DOMINANT BYPATH BY ECG ON BODY SURFACE

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:庄国强[1] 宋治远[1] 舒茂琴[1] 孙渝锦[1] 杨柳[1] 柴虹[1] 

机构地区:[1]第三军医大学西南医院,重庆400038

出  处:《解放军医学杂志》2003年第7期654-655,共2页Medical Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army

基  金:广东省重点科技开发项目资助课题 (编号 2KMO430 3C)

摘  要:目的 提高体表心电图对显性旁道定位的准确性 ,缩短射频消融术的手术时间。方法 对 5 0例右侧显性旁道在射频消融术前采集了头胸导联与常规Wilson右胸导联体表心电图 ,结合射频消融术的靶点进行分析 ,比较其两两的符合率。结果 右前间隔、右前游离壁、右后游离壁及右后间隔的符合率分别为 10 0 %、10 0 %、95 45 %和 90 91% ,常规导联的符合率为 5 8 3 3 % ,68 75 % ,61 90 % ,81 81%。头胸导联对右后间隔显性旁道的定位与常规Wilson导联差异无显著性意义 (P >0 .0 5 ) ,而对右侧游离壁及右前间隔显性旁道的定位诊断明显优于常规Wilson导联 (P <0 .0 1)。Objective To increase the precision in localization of atrioventricular accessory pathway by body surface ECG and to shorten the operation time of RFCA. Methods The features of the body surface ECGs with HC lead and Wilson′s lead were studied in 50 cases of right atrioventricular accessory pathway before RFCA and compared these ECGs for localization of the target point for RFCA. Results The results showed that there was no significant difference in the localization of right-posteroseptal accessory pathway between HC lead and Wilson lead (P>0.05), and HC lead ECG was more useful than Wilson lead when applied to localize the right free wall and right-anteroseptal accessory pathway (P<0.01). Conclusion HC lead ECG is helpful to localize the right lateral accessory pathway precisely.

关 键 词:头胸导联 WILSON导联 右侧显性旁道 

分 类 号:R540[医药卫生—心血管疾病]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象