我国无罪推定原则的矛盾反思  

Introspection on Contradictions of Doctrine of thePresumption of Innocence

作　　者：江涌[1] 

机构地区：[1]江苏警官学院侦查系,江苏南京210012

出　　处：《甘肃政法学院学报》2004年第1期47-51,共5页Journal of Gansu Political Science and Law Institute

摘　　要：无罪推定原则的移植应该结合本国实际情况进行。如果不能恰当地给无罪推定原则以合理定位 ,无罪推定原则必然与其它理念、制度和话语发生矛盾 ,具体来看 ,理念层面存在本体论、认识论和价值论的矛盾 ,制度层面主要反映为沉默权与讯问权的矛盾、控方举证与非法证据的排除规则的矛盾、疑罪从无与缺失一事不再理原则的矛盾 ,话语层面的矛盾集中反映为话语权垄断引起的判断的矛盾。The doctrine of the presumption of innocence should be transplanted according to domestic actual situations. If the reasonable orientation is not set properly, the doctrine of the presumption of innocence will be inevitably in contradiction to other ideology, institutions and discourses. To be specific, from the perspective of ideology, there are contradictions concerning ontology, epistemology and axiology. From the perspective of institutions, they are reflected as contradictions concerning right to silence and right to interrogation, contradictions concerning burden of proof by prosecuting party and exclusive rule of illegal evidence, contradictions concerning construed innocence in doubtful cases and absence of doctrine of non bis in idem. From the perspective of discourses, they are mainly reflected as contradictions concerning judgments arising from discourse hegemony.

关 键 词：无罪推定原则 中国 沉默权 讯问权 法律移植 刑诉法原则 控方举证制度 非法证据 

分 类 号：D924.1[政治法律—刑法学]