掌背侧伸肌腱三种缝合方法的比较  

Comparison of three kinds of suture for the extended tendons in the dorsal palms

作　　者：王洪林[1] 栾洪佳 马凯宇[1] 赵崇海[1] 

机构地区：[1]佳木斯市中心医院骨外科,黑龙江佳木斯154002

出　　处：《黑龙江医药科学》2004年第1期30-31,共2页Heilongjiang Medicine and Pharmacy

摘　　要：目的 :用连续锁边缝合、改良 kessler、“8”字缝合方法修复掌背侧伸肌腱并进行比较。方法 :1995～ 2 0 0 2年用此三种方法缝合了 111条掌背侧伸肌腱并进行 Ridit分析。结果 :连续锁边缝合明显优于改良 kessler和“8”字缝合法 (P <0 .0 1) ,改良 kessler与“8”字缝合法无显著差异 (P >0 .0 5 )。结论 :对于掌背侧扁平伸肌腱组织的断裂 ,连续锁边缝合后优于其它二种方法 。Objective: Comparison of the continuous hemstich suture .the modified kessler's suture and hte '8-shape' suture for the extended tendon in the dorsal palms .Methods :From 1995 to 2002 we used the three kinds of suture to repair 111tendons of the dorsal palms and analyzed the data with Ridit. Results: The continuous hemstick suture was superior to the other two methods (P<0.01). The other two methods were not different. (P>0.05).Conclusion: The continuous hemstick suture is superior to the other methods when the flat extended tendons were repaired,therefore worthy of being recommended.

关 键 词：连续锁边缝合 改良Kessler缝合 “8”字缝合 掌背侧伸肌腱 

分 类 号：R686.1[医药卫生—骨科学]