检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:雷钰[1]
机构地区:[1]西北大学文博学院
出 处:《西亚非洲》2004年第1期23-29,共7页West Asia and Africa
摘 要:单一选区比例代表制是以色列议会选举的核心。建国后 ,对它的争议几乎从未停息过 ,人们不断尝试改革选举制度。 1 992年 ,议会终于通过了由选民直接选举总理的新选举法 ,堪称以色列最大的选举改革。然而 ,事实证明这是一次事与愿违的改革 ,它“产生了与改革者的意图正好相反的结果” :党派数量大幅度增加 ,以色列政坛分崩离析 ;议席呈分散化趋势 ,大党的优势减弱 ,小党尤其是宗教党的作用不断增强 ;内阁危机更加频繁。因此 ,废除总理直选制势在必行。The form of single proportional electoral rule is the core of the parliamentary electoral system in Israel. However, debates about it have almost never stopped since the founding of Israel. In 1992, the Israeli parliament passed a new electoral law to let the voters elect prime minister directly. This electoral reform can be called the most momentous institutional change in the electoral law but it turns out to be contrary to the reformers' wishes as the facts show. The number of the parties increases considerably, fragmentations appear on Israeli political arena, seats of the parliament are diversified with the strength of big parties decreasing and the role of small parties,increasing; cabinet crisis occurs more frequently than before. Under these circumstances, it's imperative to annul the electoral law according to which the prime minister is elected directly .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.177