检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:詹秋文[1] 汪本福[1] 肖新[1] 汪水兵[1] 李正鹏[2] 张守栋[3]
机构地区:[1]安徽技术师范学院农学系,安徽凤阳233100 [2]安徽技术师范学院生物系,安徽凤阳233100 [3]南京农业大学农学院,江苏南京210095
出 处:《草业学报》2004年第2期61-66,共6页Acta Prataculturae Sinica
基 金:安徽省自然科学基金资助项目"高粱与苏丹草遗传背景差异及其杂交种抗蚜虫性状的改良"(01041102);安徽省教育厅资助项目(2001kj061;2003kj069);安徽省高等学校"十五"优秀人才计划(2003022)资助。
摘 要:4个苏丹草(Sorghumsudanense)品种和6个高粱(S.bicolor)品种被用来进行高粱和苏丹草的比较研究。结果表明,定性性状22,24,31在高粱与苏丹草上表现完全一致;数量性状除3,9,13,15,19,27,38,41,42,46,47,48,49,57在2类间差异不显著外,其余皆达显著或极显著水平。高粱与苏丹草品种间F测验达极显著水平,但苏丹草品种内1与2,3的F测验不显著,高粱品种6,7,10间F测验不显著。全部个体判别分析表明,各品种回判正确率为100%。聚类分析表明,参试的10个品种被明显分成2类,即苏丹草1,2,3,4聚为一类,高粱5,6,7,8,9,10聚为另一类。数量指标的方差分析显示,聚类指标的选择是合理的。66 biological characteristics were looked at for a comparative study between sorghum ( Sorghum (bicolor) ) and sudangrass ( Sorghum sudanense ) by means of variance, discrimination and cluster analyses. (Significant) differences in biological characteristics between sorghum and sudangrass were found. The F -test (divergence) values between the varieties of sorghum and sudangrass were mostly highly significant. (Discrimination) analysis of all plants suggested that 100% of originally grouped cases were correctly classified. Cluster analysis showed the 10 varieties of sorghum and sudangrass in the study fell into 2 groups, namely four sudangrass varieties making up one kind, and six sorghum varieties making up the other. Analysis of variance showed the characteristics chosen for cluster analysis were reasonable.
分 类 号:S311[农业科学—作物栽培与耕作技术]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.137.41.2