检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:程洁[1]
机构地区:[1]清华大学法学院
出 处:《法学研究》2004年第2期50-56,共7页Chinese Journal of Law
摘 要:司法机构应当审查土地征用纠纷的合理性及具体适用原则。在现行法律环境下,人民法院在实践中倾向于不受理土地征用纠纷。这导致纠纷的搁置与延期,使利益冲突长期悬而不决,方便土地征用权滥用。司法机构的介入为检验征用补偿的合法性与合理性提供了客观中介,有助于改善被征用土地的定价系统、减少土地权属流转中的磨擦。通过立法确认司法救济的上述功能最终有利于实现土地征用的社会效益。The judicial organizations should review the legitimacy and the concrete application principles of the disputes arising from the expropriation of lands. Under the current legal environment, People's Courts tend not to accept and hear such disputes, which delays the settlement of the disputes, conflicts of lands interests hanging along timelessly, making it easy to abuse the land expropriation power. The intervention of the judicial organizations provides an objective medium to test the legitimacy and reasonableness of the reimbursement of the expropriation, helping to improve the price fixing machine about the expropriated lands and to reduce the conflicts in the conveyance of the lands titles and interests. It will be finally helpful to realize the social effect of the land expropriation through the legislative acknowledgment of the above - mentioned functions of judicial remedy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.185