检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:焦兵[1]
机构地区:[1]西安石油大学经济管理学院,陕西西安710065
出 处:《西安石油大学学报(社会科学版)》2004年第1期16-20,共5页Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University:Social Science Edition
摘 要:针对强制性制度变迁与诱致性制度变迁效率的争论 ,试图对其建立一个统一的判断标准。从公共选择学派的“同意一致性”原则出发 ,建立逻辑上一致的判断标准 ,同时利用这一标准对石油工业三次大的制度变迁的效率进行分析 ,得出了比较一致的结论 ,也对这一标准进行了实证的检验。In the present world of economics, it is widely agreed that institutional evolution can be divided into two types: reduced and mandatory, according to the different modes of inducement for institutional evolution. A general opinion is that the efficiency of mandatory institutional evolution is lower than that of induced one. But there is no widely-accepted standard to go by to make such a judgement. In this paper, based on the unanimous agreement principle held by the Public Selection School, an attempt is made to establish a standard for the judgement of institutional efficiency. By this standard, a description is made of the efficiency changes of institutional evolution in China's oil industry.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49