检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:哈书菊[1]
机构地区:[1]黑龙江大学法学院
出 处:《俄罗斯东欧中亚研究》2004年第2期49-54,共6页Russian,East European & Central Asian Studies
摘 要:苏联解体后 ,俄罗斯作为苏联的主要继承国 ,其社会性质已经发生了根本变化。它如何构建行政诉讼制度 ,其理论走向如何 ?这些问题对我国来说是一个比较荒漠的领域。笔者认为 ,俄罗斯已仿照西方国家初创了与苏联有本质区别的行政诉讼制度 ,还亟待改进和完善。为此 ,俄罗斯学者一直在进行积极探索。从理论走向看 ,集中在两个方面 :一是围绕行政诉讼概念、本质和特点进行行政诉讼基本理论研究 ;二是俄罗斯行政诉讼的应然模式和行政诉讼法典化问题。After the disintegration of the Soviet Union,A fundamental change has taken place in Russia,the main successor state of the Soviet Union. It is an unknown area for us Chinese as to what Russia as the main inherited state of the former USSR would do to build an administrative lawsuit system,and what a theoretical orientation it would follow in this connection. The author of this article holds that Russia,following the example of the West,has already initiated an administrative lawsuit system,which is essentially different from that of the former USSR,but remains to be improved and made sound urgently. For this purpose,Russian scholars have been probing energetically in this regard. Judging from the theoretical orientation,the probe has concentrated on two aspects: (1) studies on the basic theory of administrative lawsuit focusing on its concept,essence and special features;(2) the ought-to-be model of Russian administrative lawsuit and its codification.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28