董事忠实义务之分析与借鉴  

Analysis and Reference to Directors' Obligations of Honesty & Faith

作　　者：何国华[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京化工大学文法学院,北京100029

出　　处：《北京化工大学学报（社会科学版）》2003年第2期14-19,共6页Journal of Beijing University of Chemical Technology(Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：随着股东会中心主义向董事会中心主义转变,董事所担负的法律义务和责任问题凸显出来。英美法系和大陆法系主要国家立法均确定了董事的忠实义务,但忠实义务的内涵与外延缺少确定的表述。作为一项限制要素,如果缺少明确具体的内容,将面临任意限制董事权力行使的危险,进而抑制董事从事经营管理积极性。防止董事滥用职权非常重要,防止任意限权同样重要。因此,明确董事义务的内涵,是判定董事行为正当合理的重要标准,是维持董事权义平衡的前提。Along with the conversion of shareholders' conference centralism to the centralism of board of directors,the obligations and responsibilities borne by directors come to be more clear and important. While the English-American legislation system and the Continental legislation system have clearly stated the direc-tors' obligation of honesty and faith, its connotatives and extents have not been stated. As one of the restric-tive essentials, when lack of clear and concrete contents, the obligation of honesty and faith will be confront-ed with the danger of confining the fulfillment of directors' rights recklessly, which is consequently to hold-back the directors' initiativesin operating management. While it is important to prevent the directors' abuse of rights, it is essential for the prevention of reckless confining of the rights. Therefore, making clear the conno-tatives of the directors' obligation is not only an important criterion to justify if the directors' activities are proper and reasonable, but also a premise for the maintaining of the balance of directors ' rights.

关 键 词：董事会 忠实义务 董事权力 中国 《公司法》 

分 类 号：D922.29[政治法律—经济法学]