检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张耕[1]
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学,重庆400031
出 处:《现代法学》2004年第2期119-124,共6页Modern Law Science
摘 要:技术保护措施弥补了法律手段保护版权的不足 ,但技术保护措施又催生了更先进的破解技术及其装置 ,版权及其邻接权权利人的利益受到严重威胁 ,世界知识产权组织和主要国家均加强了反规避技术措施的立法。本文从技术保护措施的主体、相关性、有效性及目的正当性方面考察了各国对技术措施的界定 ,并对规避侵权行为的表现形式、侵权抗辩进行了比较研究 ,分析了我国著作权法中有关反规避技术措施的立法缺陷 ,提出了相应的改进思路。Technologically protective measures make up for disadvantages in protecting copyrights with legal methods; however, it encourages the more advanced deciphered technology and its devices. Thus, the copyright holder's interests of copyrights and the neighboring rights of them would be seriously threatened. WIPO and the leading countries reinforce the legislation on anti-circumvention of the technologically protective measures. This article observes the definition of technologically protective measures in various countries with respect to subjects, relevancy, effectiveness and justice of the purpose, and conducts a comparative study on the form of circumvention of infringement and defense for infringement. This paper also analyzes the legislative defect in the relevant provisions of anti-circumvention of technologically protective measures in our Copyright Law and puts forward corresponding ways to amend it.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.218.75.143