检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西安交通大学管理学院,陕西西安710049 [2]杭州商学院金融学院,浙江杭州310035
出 处:《管理工程学报》2004年第2期71-73,共3页Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(79970013);国家自然科学基金优秀研究群体项目(70121001);国家教育振兴行动计划专项资金项目(A2.9-GL)
摘 要:企业的R&D投资活动习惯上被分为需求创造型创新(DCI)和成本节约型创新(CRI),一方面在现实中DCI广泛存在,而另一方面学术研究仅在CRI上取得丰硕成果,如果能够证实两种创新的模型存在一致性,则对CPI的研究成果的推广具有重要现实意义。本文从Levin和Reiss的DCI模型出发,进行变换推理,得到包含外溢性的CRI模型,从而证明两者在产业组织经济分析的本质上是一致的。R&D is generally classified as demandcreating and costreducing innovations. The former group is generally exists in reality, yet most researches is limited within the latter group and exciting findings appeared one after another. If the models that studying different group of R&D can be verified to be consistent with each other, its helpful to extend the important findings to demandcreating innovations. This paper start with Levin and Reisiss demandcreating model considering spillovers. After some transformation, we get a model of cost reducing innovation.Therefore, we conclude that these two groups of innovations are the same in their essence.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.193.179