检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈岱佳[1] 谢德荣[1] 李志花[1] 谢雪霞[1] 陈丽容[1] 梁佩仲[1]
机构地区:[1]中山大学附属第二医院肿瘤化疗科,广东广州510120
出 处:《肿瘤防治杂志》2004年第2期179-180,共2页China Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment
摘 要:目的 :探讨PICC在 5 FU持续静脉滴入 48h(DeGramont方案 )所致外周静脉炎中的应用价值。方法 :65例患者 ,随机分为对照组 3 5例 ,于滴入期间每隔 4h推注肝素盐水稀释液 10mL ;PICC组 3 0例 ,采用PICC进行持续滴入。两组病例的一般临床分布基本均衡。结果 :PICC组静脉炎仅为 2例 ,较对照组 2 6% (9/3 5 )为低 ,P =0 0 41,均无Ⅲ、Ⅳ度静脉炎 ;两组人均治疗总费用相似 ,1986 5 8元vs 182 0 73元 ,P =0 0 60。结论 :PICC能有效地预防DeGramont方案所致静脉炎 ,且不增加治疗的总费用 。OBJECTIVE:To observe the clinical value of PICC in preventing and treating pheripheral phlebitis caused by chemotherapy with De Gramont regiment in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma(ACC).METHODS:Sixty five patients of ACC were eligible for this study,30 cases of them were randomly assigned to PICC group and 35 to control one.Patient characteristics were balanced in two groups.RESULTS:The rate of phlebitis was 7% for PICC group,26% for control one, P =0 041,there was no 3 or 4 grade phlebitis in two groups.The total cost was no statistically different in 2 groups, 1 986 58 Yan vs 1 820 73 Yan, P =0 060.CONCLUSIONS:The PICC could effectively reduce the incidence of phlebitis caused by chemotherapy with De Gramont regiment in patients with ACC,and not increase the total cost.It is worthy of further clinical trails.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15