检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2004年第3期117-120,共4页Journal of Shanxi University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
摘 要:文章对美国《关税法》337条款的内容特点做了深入和客观的分析,对337条款与WTO有关贸易规则、美国301条款、反倾销条款的异同进行了比较研究,并对如何完善我国的相关法律制度,及我国企业在对外经贸往来中如何应对337条款以维护自己的合法利益提出了有针对性的法律建议。This essay makes an analysis of Clause No. 337 of American Tariff Law objectively and thoroughly, and it also makes a comparison among Clause No. 337 of American tariff law, the WTO relevant trading regulations, Clause No. 301 and clauses of anti-dumping for the similarities and differences. It also gives some advices both on perfection of the related legal systems of our country in the external exchange of economy and commerce and on how to reply to Clause No. 337 of American Tariff Law for our own legal benefits.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117