是渴望“血性”还是缅怀“血腥”  

Hungry for uprightness or Recallmg Bloody

作　　者：程戈[1] 

机构地区：[1]东北师范大学文学院,吉林长春130024

出　　处：《克山师专学报》2003年第4期41-43,共3页Journal of Keshan Teachers College

摘　　要：作家和学者对当下生活的认识和判断是一个美学问题，也是一个伦理学问题。对人类历史的无视和对人类一般道德立场的挑战都不是作家和学者的特权。美化人类历史的罪恶更不是作家和学者的特权。将血腥的历史解释成为有血性的历史，而且还要将这样的历史加以粉饰和赞美，这种现象在一些文学作品和理论文章里时有表达，本文对韩少功和徐葆耕的两部（篇）代表性作品中的观点作了批判性的讨论，从史实、对待史实的态度、作家与学者的底线、文化的域限与原因等方面进行了深入的探讨。What the writers and scholars recognize and judge is an aesthetic problem and an ethic problem .it is not the writers' and the scholars' privileges to neglect the human history and to challenge the human general ethic stand .the phenomena of explaining the history to be courageous and upright and even prettifying and eulogizing such a history sometimes are expressed in some literary works and theoretic papers .in this paper I critically discuss and deeply explore two representative papers separately written by Han Shaogong and Xu Baogeng,about the historic facts, the attitudes to the facts,the fields and causes of the writers' and the scholars'basic standards .

关 键 词：“血腥” 《让血性冲破牢笼》 文学创作 文学批评 韩少功 徐葆耕 

分 类 号：I206.7[文学—中国文学]