对中外专利商标司法救济模式的调查分析和比较研究(下)  

Comparative Study and Research on the Mode of Judicial Remedy for Patent and Trademark (Ⅱ)

作　　者：李新生[1] 强刚华 刘井玉[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京市第一中级人民法院,北京100040

出　　处：《行政法学研究》2004年第2期83-91,共9页ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW

摘　　要：基于对我国的行政行为效力理论、诉讼机制、法院组织机构以及内部审理组织设置等因素的现状的分析,目前契合于我国制度背景的司法救济模式只能是在坚持固有的案件性质和法院审理组织之间一一对应的前提下,由行政审判庭审理专利复审委和商标评审委为被告的行政案件。Basing on analysis of several factors such as theory of legal force of administrative act, mechanism of litigation, organs of courts and their inner organization, the mode of judicial remedy for patent and trademark is that administrative divisions of people' s courts handle administrative cases with Patent Reexamination Board and Trademark Review and Adjudication Board as the defendant.

关 键 词：司法救济 行政行为 诉讼机制 法院组织机构 行政审判庭 专利复审委 商标评审委 专利管理 商标权 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]