回归与漂泊——《故乡》与《边城》的比较阅读  

作　　者：罗飞雁[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽师范大学文学院,安徽芜湖241000

出　　处：《黄山学院学报》2004年第2期82-86,共5页Journal of Huangshan University

摘　　要：在探索传统与中国知识分子关系的重要命题上,鲁迅与沈从文作为最具研究价值的精神文化现象散发着恒久的魅力。本文以"回乡"的文学母题为研究视角,择取《边城》与《故乡》,从文化选择、个体生命的历史定位、精神趋向这三个各自独立又相互联系的方面,展现游子精神返乡之旅的种种复杂情思以及沈从文和鲁迅对传统的象征——故土故园皈依与超越的不同选择。In exploring the relationship between the traditional adture and the Chinese intellectuals, Shen Congwen and Lu Xun are often regarded as the typical representatives to be researched for the culture of spirits. On the topic If return to the hometown, this paper discusses the two writers' different chives and attitudes to the homeland——the symbol of the tradition, with the reference to Shen Cong Wen's Remote Town and Lu Xun's Hometown in the following aspects: cultural tendency, recognition of roles in the history and the spiritual inclination. It expresses the complicated affection of the wandering son in the return of spirits and points out Shen Cong Wen's return and Lu Xun's transcendence.

关 键 词：《故乡》 《边城》 鲁迅 沈从文 小说评论 

分 类 号：I207.42[文学—中国文学] I210.6