认识论中的乌托邦批判  

Criticism on the "Utopia" in Epistemology

作　　者：赵军政[1] 

机构地区：[1]陕西理工学院政法系,陕西汉中723000

出　　处：《西安交通大学学报（社会科学版）》2004年第2期76-80,共5页Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University：Social Sciences

摘　　要：　反本质主义及其引发的"后现代思潮"在经历了大半个世纪思想里程以后,其自身存在的问题已日益显露,但其试图将人们的思想从对本质主义抽象理念的盲目迷信中拖出来,使人们永远地同一元独断论告别,其价值是不可估量的。哲学的关注焦点应该是具体的存在而并非观念的本质,"是什么"的概括最终必须落实于对"怎么样"的阐释。因此,从本体论哲学的废墟里撤退出来的20世纪哲学,设法别开生面地营造一种"多元普遍主义"格局,虽然怀有一种普遍性理想但却不再固守排它性的立场,这或许就是现代哲学所能拥有的一种话语与知识形态。After over a half-century′s development of the anti-nativism and the ensuing 'Post-modern Thinking Trends', their own existent problems are emerging with each passing day. The attempts to drag our thoughts out of the blind belief in nativist abstract theories and to bid farewell to the monist dictatorial thoughts are invaluable. The philosophical focus should be placed on the concrete existence, but not the nature of ideas instead. The generalization of 'what it is' must ultimately be put into practice by the interpretation of 'how it is'. Therefore, the 20th century philosophy, which is withdrawn from the ruins of the ontology and manages to build up a different pattern of 'pluralist universalism' in a new way, is, perhaps, a form of discourse and knowledge possessed by the modern philosophy, though it has a universal ideal but no longer clings to its exclusive position.

关 键 词：哲学 认识论 本质主义 反本质主义 

分 类 号：B08[哲学宗教—哲学理论]