检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邵继红[1] 黄水平[1] 陈虎[1] 姜海霞[1]
出 处:《徐州医学院学报》2004年第3期244-247,共4页Acta Academiae Medicinae Xuzhou
基 金:江苏省教育厅自然科学基金项目 (0 2KJD330 0 0 2 )
摘 要:目的 调查徐州市小学生单纯性肥胖患病情况 ,比较标准体重法与新标准BMI法判断儿童肥胖的差异。方法 采用多阶段分层整群抽样方法 ,对徐州市 2 5所小学 1~ 5年级学生进行调查并体检。结果 标准体重法 ,徐州市 7~ 11岁儿童超重与肥胖的总检出率分别为 13.3%、17.4 % ,肥胖 -超重比 (OOR)为 0 .8;新标准BMI法 ,徐州市 7~ 11岁儿童超重与肥胖的总检出率分别为 12 .2 %、11.3% ,OOR为 1.1;新标准男、女儿童超重与肥胖的检出率均低于标准体重法 (P <0 .0 1) ,而OOR值略高于标准体重法。结论 徐州市儿童超重与肥胖的检出率均较高 ,但OOR均在可接受范围内 ;尽快实施有效干预措施可能控制或遏制儿童肥胖的高发趋势 ;新的儿童肥胖判断标准更符合实际 ,且便于操作。Objective To investigate the prevalence of childhood simple obesity in primary school and compare the conventional method of standard body weight to the new body mass index (BMI).Methods A multiple stage stratified cluster sampling was conducted among the grade 1-5 students in 25 primary schools of Xuzhou.Results The total prevalence of overweight and obesity and OOR (the ratio of overweight and obesity) was 13.3%, 17.4% and 0.8 with standard body weight and 12.2%, 11.3% and 1.1 with new BMI in 7-11 years old students. The prevalence with new BMI was lower than that with standard body weight (P<0.01), with its value of OOR being slightly higher than that of standard body weight. Conclusion The primary school students prevalence of overweight and obesity were rather high in Xuzhou, but the value of OOR was within the acceptable range and the high tendency may be controlled or held back by taking effective measures. The new BMI criteria of childhood overweight and obesity are more in accord with facts and easy to practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117