检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:尹立雪[1] 蔡力[1] 李春梅[1] 邓燕[1] 程力剑[1] 李爽[1] 王珊[1] Tim Laske Nancy Rakow Terrell Williams 郑昌琼[3] 李德玉[3] 汪天富[3] 郑翊
机构地区:[1]四川省人民医院彩超室 [2]美国Medtronic Inc.心脏节律控制部 [3]四川大学生物医学工程中心 [4]美国St.Cloude州立大学电子与计算机系
出 处:《中国医学影像技术》2004年第5期670-672,共3页Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
基 金:卫生部优秀青年科技人材专项科研基金(9930 );四川省重点科技攻关项目 (0 1SG0 4 6 0 1);国家自然科学基金(60 1 72 0 59);美国Medtronic Inc科学研究基金
摘 要:目的 采用单一的心腔内超声心动图和组织多普勒显像技术检测和评价直接希氏束起搏诱导的心室激动顺序、心脏解剖结构和血流动力学重构。方法 六只急性闭胸直接希氏束起搏狗模型。采用美国Medtronic导向引导鞘管和主动螺旋电极 ,在心腔内超声心动图和组织多普勒显像技术引导下将起搏电极分别置放于希氏束 (n =6)和右室心尖 (n =6)。所有部位的起搏频率均控制为 12 0次 /min。采用二维灰阶、血流频谱多普勒和组织多普勒技术 ,分别测量和计算心脏不同部位起搏时心室各房室和相连大血管解剖结构内径和容量、心肌的激动顺序和相关血流动力学参数 ,并进行不同起搏状态上述测量参数的配对统计比较。结果 希氏束起搏状态下 ,左心室壁内心肌的激动顺序、心脏主要解剖结构和血流动力学参数与窦性心律状态下相同参数比较无显著性差异 ;与右心室心尖起搏状态下相同参数比较有显著性差异。结论 单一的心腔内超声和组织多普勒技术能够有效地量化评价心脏起搏状态下的心脏解剖结构和血流动力学改变。与右心室心尖部起搏相比较 。Objective His bundle pacing (HBP) has been proposed to improve cardiac function and hemodynamics. This study compares the hemodynamic performance of HBP to right ventricular apical pacing (RVA) and sinus rhythm. Methods In the acute tests of six anesthetized closed chest canines, a custom designed bipolar screw in lead was implanted using a steerable delivery catheter guided with intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) and tissue Doppler imaging (TDI). The bipolar leads were implanted near the His bundle (HBP) and in the right ventricular apex (RVA). A pacing rate of 120 bpm was used to compare HBP (VOO mode), RVA (VOO mode), and sinus rhythm (SR). Results QRS widths were as follows: SR = 59.7 + 5.3 m; HBP = 82.8 + 16.6 m; RVA = 106.3 + 18.4 m ( P <0.05 for all comparisons). HBP included direct His pacing ( n =1) and His + ventricular septal capture ( n =5). Cardiac function, hemodynamics, and sequence of ventricular excitation were analyzed using ICE and TDI. During HBP, a similar pattern of left ventricular excitation and hemodynamic function was seen as in sinus rhythm. The HBP data are similar to SR and significantly different than RVA pacing (Table 1). Conclusion HBP significantly improves cardiac performance when compared to RVA pacing. The hemodynamic improvements could be evaluated quantitatively and efficiently using ICE and TDI.
分 类 号:R332[医药卫生—人体生理学] R331.31[医药卫生—基础医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117