历史非决定论在自然与社会界限问题上的误区  

Mistakes of Historical Indeterminism on the Borderline between Nature and Social History

作　　者：刘曙光[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学学报编辑部,北京100871

出　　处：《株洲工学院学报》2004年第4期1-6,共6页Journal of Zhuzhou Institute of Technology

基　　金：北京大学"十五""211工程"建设项目"马克思主义历史哲学"

摘　　要：历史非决定论否定社会历史发展规律的原因是十分复杂的。其中,以历史主体的能动创造性、社会历史现象的独一无二性和社会历史事件的随机偶然性为由,夸大自然与社会的界限是其重大失误之一。实际上,历史主体的活动是客观制约性与主体选择性的统一,社会历史现象是普遍性与特殊性、共性与个性的统一,社会历史事件是必然性与偶然性的有机统一,社会历史和自然界一样是有着不以人的意志为转移的客观规律的。The reasons that historical indeterminism deny the laws of social history are very complicated. A grave mistake of historical indeterminism lies in that they aggrandizes the differences between nature and social history because of the dynamic of historical subject, the solitariness of social and historical phenomenon, and the contingency of social history events. In fact, the activities of historical subject are the unities of objective conditionality and subjective selectivity, social and historical phenomenon is the unities of universality and particularity, social and historical events are the unities of necessity and contingency. Social history has objective laws which are independent of the will of man, just as nature.

关 键 词：历史非决定论 自然 社会 区别 规律 

分 类 号：B017.8[哲学宗教—哲学理论]