姚明肖像权纠纷的法律思考  

Legal Thinking on Disputes of Yaoming's Right to Portrait

作　　者：关中烈[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖南公安高等专科学校,湖南长沙410138

出　　处：《广西政法管理干部学院学报》2004年第4期90-92,共3页Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law

摘　　要：公民的肖像权属于个人享有 ,集体是没有集体肖像权的。集体肖像作为商业用途时 ,应分别取得集体肖像中每个个体肖像权人的同意。行政规定与现行法律不一致 ,基于上述规定的“再授权性质”的合同则有可能是无效合同 ,它不因当事人的同意或默认而生效。即使本人签约同意相关部门使用其肖像权 ,并不等于他允许相关部门“再授权”他人使用。尊重权利人的权利最好的方法 ,就是运动队和运动员之间签订部分转让肖像权的协议 ,从而推动中国体育产业领域的法制化建设。A citizen's right to portrait belongs to himself only. The collectiveness has no the right to the collective right to portrait, so the commercial use of the collective portrait should be admitted by every individual with his figure in it. He singing the contract to agree to the use of his portrait by relative organizations doesn't mean that he allow the relative organizations to re-authorize the use of his portrait by others.

关 键 词：肖像权 集体肖像权 默认 再授权 转让协议 

分 类 号：D923.1[政治法律—民商法学]